13 April 2005

Stop Bolton!

Please please please for the sake of this world call Senator Chafee (202) 224-2921 and tell him to vote AGAINST Bolton. Here is our chance! There is hope.

Keep this in mind as you consider this option:

Bolton has come out opposing the ICC and the UN, yet we are appointing him as our representative.

When Clinton was president and there was a representative more willing to negotiate with other nations we still used our veto to oppose action in Rwanda. 800,000+ people died.

Bolton will use his veto power more expansively.

As globalization increases we need to have working relationships with other nations. Do something to sustain this! Please, for the sake of the future.

Peace, krissy

Senate Committee Delays Vote on Bolton
By Barry Schweid
The Associated Press

Wednesday 13 April 2005

Washington - President Bush's drive to make John R. Bolton the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations got sidetracked Wednesday as Senate Democrats forced a delay until next week of an important confirmation vote.

In buying time, they hoped to win over a pivotal Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, by amassing evidence that Bolton harassed U.S. officials who challenged his judgment on weapons issues.

Chafee said Wednesday he is leaning toward supporting Bolton, which would all but assure Bolton's confirmation.

Bolton, currently the undersecretary of state, has rejected the accusations.

A committee vote, tentatively planned for Thursday, was scrubbed after Democrats objected, said Andy Fisher, spokesman for the chairman, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

Under Senate rules, at least one Democratic senator has to attend a meeting for a vote to occur.

Democrats want further questioning of Bolton in writing and they are seeking testimony by three U.S. officials on what lawmakers said were Bolton's efforts to remove the dissenting analysts.

Fisher said the three officials already had been interviewed by committee aides and their statements were made public.

"There is no need for an additional hearing," he said.

The postponement was agreed to by Lugar and the committee's senior Democrat, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, said Norm Kurz, an aide to Biden.

"A nomination of this importance deserves providing each and every senator with ample time," Kurz said.

Republicans hold a 10-8 committee majority. Unanimous GOP support would send Bolton's nomination to the GOP-controlled Senate, where approval is considered likely.

The committee, in two days of hearings this week, heard from two witnesses, Bolton and Carl Ford Jr., a former chief at the State Department's bureau of intelligence and research.

Ford denounced Bolton as a bully and a "serial abuser" of lower-level officials who challenged his assessments of the weapons potential of Cuba and other nations.

In a letter to Lugar, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., requested an additional hearing in which three officials would testify on Bolton's dealings with intelligence analysts. Dodd described Bolton as "evasive."

The three officials Dodd wants questioned are Thomas Fingar, assistant secretary of state for intelligence; Neil Silver, director of the strategic proliferation office; and Stuart Cohen, a former acting chief of the National Intelligence Council.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice took issue with Ford's characterization of Bolton as a bully.

"John Bolton has been a very effective manager and diplomat," she said. She added, "It would be very useful if we could get this nomination done."

Rice said she believed strongly in the "role of debate, the role of the open and free exchange of ideas."

But, she said, when decisions are taken, "I fully expect that people will support those decisions because there is only one president of the United States and that's President Bush."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Enjoyed article untill I found out you are gay! Disgusting

keesa said...

Interesting.

So, am I gay because I support gay rights, or do you know something more about me?

Is my opinion more credible if I date men? I'll have to let my partner know (He or She may be a man or a woman - you have no right to know).

Anonymous said...

Boy, you're a piece of work Krissy.

I'll never vote republican because of the party's history and the type of voters who back them (Free Republic) even though I kinda agree with their fiscal policies.
However, the dems are just getting under my skin. All criticism, no ideas, no firm positions, all doom and gloom. To me they are now a bunch of confused/clueless people hiding under a cloath of pragmatism. Their opportunism is just as bad as the repubs. Black people for example always vote for them by default despite the fact that they don't care about their interest 90% of the time. Seeing Kerry suddenly going to black churches was just so ridiculous... I don't know what's worse: repubs don't care at all about minorities but the dems only come around when they need votes.

Tell me, do you fit this description of a typical Dean supporter?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32379-2005Apr6.html

Anonymous said...

I'm amazed. I was sure everyone thought the UN was doing a fine job and that it's current structure, management, and employee behaviour was optimal. It seems crazy to radically change something that's so popular and working so well. Is this just some sort of partisan over-reaction to the Bolton nomination?

If you want an example of the effectiveness of the UN, think of Rwanda in 1994, Bosnia 1990, Sudan 04, etc. Lots to be proud of, eh? Besides, how many of the 182 or so countries of the UN are actually free and democratic? Is the vote of Sudan, Zimbabwe or Libya really equal in moral authority to that of Sweden or Norway? Time to scrap the whole corrupt shebang.

The UN is the toothless League of Nations, because at the present time the decisions are being taken by the strong states. The UN should have exclusively a humanitarian role and should not take any political decisions.

I, for one, would support a hardliner like Bolton and Wolfowitz to represent us in those failed international organizations.

keesa said...

I fit much of this description of Dean supporters, but I would align my ideals with the Green Party.

peace, krissy